Wow, makes me dizzy. :)

Question: Shouldn’t this technique show a much more pronounced lack of dept of field than the normal pictures, like it was a macro? I read just a little bit about it a while ago and that’s what I understood, so it’s because I’m aware that I don’t know much about it that I ask.
‘Cause if it is how I understood it, then the blurry and the focused parts should be defined by the focal distance… Shouldn’t it?

I hope you don’t take this badly. I’m just taking the opportunity to clear my doubts about this.

clarkita Brett Maxwell replied to your comment on my site. Basically the tilt part of the lense, as Brett says, means you can chang the focal plane so it’s not parallel with the sensor. He’s right in saying that it’s tilted to the right. The shift part of the lense mimics moving the vantage point up down left or right. So shifting up imakes it like your standing on a ladder. Also the lens rotates so you can tilt and shift in any direction. Hope that helps? I’ll explain fully in a post during the week :)