Question: Shouldn’t this technique show a much more pronounced lack of dept of field than the normal pictures, like it was a macro? I read just a little bit about it a while ago and that’s what I understood, so it’s because I’m aware that I don’t know much about it that I ask.
‘Cause if it is how I understood it, then the blurry and the focused parts should be defined by the focal distance… Shouldn’t it?

I hope you don’t take this badly. I’m just taking the opportunity to clear my doubts about this.